If poor flashing causes a roof leak six months after occupancy, who is liable for the repair?

In the scenario where poor flashing is the cause of a roof leak that occurs six months after occupancy, the contractor is typically liable for the repair. This is grounded in the responsibility that contractors have for ensuring their work meets industry standards and building codes. Contractors are expected to deliver a finished product that is functional and free from defects, which includes proper installation of roofing components like flashing. Flashing is crucial for directing water away from critical areas of a roof and preventing leaks. If a leak arises from inadequate flashing, it suggests that the contractor may not have adhered to best practices during installation.

The responsibility of the contractor extends to the workmanship and materials used on the project. Recognizing the timeline of six months post-occupancy, this situation falls within a period where the contractor may still be held accountable for any construction defects or issues arising from their work. While there are warranties and limitations to liability that can affect the situation, the fundamental principle of holding the contractor accountable for their workmanship typically applies in these cases.

While other parties, such as the homeowner, the city, and the building inspector, have roles in the construction and inspection process, their liabilities differ and are generally more limited. The homeowner would maintain the property post-construction but is not usually responsible for